http://www.want-daily.com/News/Content.aspx?id=0&yyyymmdd=20111008&k=17915aed7bb9a81196139f84ceafb832&h=c6f057b86584942e415435ffb1fa93d4&nid=K@20111008@N0015.001
轉貼旺報全文如下:
旺報 » 新聞內容
富比士爆料：臉書CEO可能繼承遺產 [回上一頁]
2011/10/08 | 記者龔俊榮／綜合報導
蘋果創辦人賈伯斯的身後事，世人最關切的焦點是他的遺產究竟有多少？據了解，賈伯斯在獲知罹癌後，已開始規畫與安排他的遺產，以他素來低調的行事風格，外界很難一窺賈伯斯遺產的全部內容。美國《富比士》（Forbes）雜誌網路版甚至透露，臉書（Facebook）首席執行長扎克伯格可能成為賈伯斯遺產的繼承人。
大陸媒體引述路透報導指出，賈伯斯早在2009年就為身後事做準備，開始將財產進行信託管理，有法律專家剖析這項作法，可能為日後確保賈伯斯的遺產不被公開鋪路。
據路透掌握的文件顯示，賈伯斯顯然在請病假期間就辦理財產信託，目前外界不清楚賈伯斯信託的財產是否包括股票和其他非房地產資產。如果屬實，世人恐怕更難了解賈伯斯的遺產究竟有多少及分配細節。
舊金山市信託與房產律師約翰奧格拉蒂（John O Grady）表示，將股票和房產委託給信託機構，可在委託人去世時將房屋遺產稅降至最低，同時也可避免自己的財產在遺囑檢驗法院中被公開。
根據證券機構資料顯示，賈伯斯除了有蘋果股份，2006年把皮克斯（Pixar）動畫公司賣給迪士尼，換得1.38億股迪士尼股票。目前按「富比世」雜誌估計至少有70億美元身價。
《富比士》還有更勁爆的消息透露，扎克伯格可能成為賈伯斯遺產繼承人。該雜誌認為，扎克伯格與賈伯斯的人生很類似，都是在大學輟學，並開始創業，兩人一舉一動都動見觀瞻，也是全球風雲人物。賈伯斯生前將蘋果市值拱上全球第一，唯有扎克伯格有此能力、有機會超越蘋果。
--------------------------------------------------
Forbes的網址如下:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2011/10/06/why-mark-zuckerberg-is-the-heir-to-steve-jobss-legacy/
轉貼原文如下:
Why Mark Zuckerberg Is The Heir To Steve Jobs Legacy
Markets are supposed to be heartless, but in the last weeks of Steve Jobs‘s life, the stock market did him a small kindness, making the company he founded, briefly, the world’s largest in terms of its market capitalization. At $354 billion, it remains the biggest technology firm by a wide margin.
That won’t be the case much longer if you believe Scott Galloway, the investor and business school professor, who this week predicted that Facebook will surpass Apple (and ExxonMobil) in size within two years. In a way, though, that would also be fitting. As an entrepreneur, Jobs was surely sui generis, but if there’s someone out there who deserves to be compared to him, it’s Facebook’s creator, Mark Zuckerberg.
There are, for starters, the superficial comparisons. Both men dropped out of college (Jobs from Reed, Zuckerberg from Harvard) and founded their empires at an early age, though that’s almost more the norm than the exception for computer whizzes. Both rose to become cultish figures who commanded the world’s attention with annual razzle-dazzle shows, though Facebook’s F8 always seemed self-consciously modeled on Apple’s MacWorld, and Zuckerberg is miles behind in the showmanship department.
There are superficial differences, too. Jobs ticked off publishers with his parsimony toward his customers’ personal data. Zuckerberg is perhaps the leading force chipping away at consumers’ expectations of digital privacy. Jobs’s most salient quality was his perfectionism, which makes sense if you’re a hardware maker who in a given year only gets a couple bites at the apple (no pun intended). Zuckerberg can afford to be more casual about iterating; his focus is on dominance. Whereas Apple for most of its lifespan has been an upstart, a connoisseur’s alternative, Facebook almost from Day 1 has envisioned itself as ubiquitous — a dream now amazingly close to reality.
The real similarity is deeper than any of this.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
今天看到旺報的報導，覺得很不可思議，又上網Google了一下forbes的原文，我都快笑死了...
大概國中生看都知道，所謂Why Mark Zuckerberg(臉書創辦人) Is The Heir To Steve Jobs Legacy
的意思大概是"為什麼Mark Zuckerberg足以繼承Steve Jobs的遺志，翻譯成遺志也不太對，應該翻譯成留在世界上
的某種精神層面的東西...
怎麼會把他翻譯成遺產呢?我看到大概快笑了五分鐘，還"富比士爆料：臉書CEO可能繼承遺產"
台灣的報紙難道就只有這種水準嗎?
寫這篇文章的記者應該被記大過.... |
住戶編號:3066199
檢舉原因
心情: 
